Conclusion

           A conflict of opinions now continues over the matter of live broadcasting of the first and second trials. The proponents suggest that the live broadcasts of trials can help fairness of the trial and secure trust, while fulfill the people’s right to know. They also say many foreign countries also introduced this system. On the other hand, the opposition argues that the independence of the judge can be damaged, the live coverage is against the presumption of innocence, and many rights of the accused can be violated. This controversy is the matter of the law, so it seems that thorough social discussion should be continued. Efforts to refine the contents of the law will also have to be needed.
저작권자 © 중앙헤럴드 무단전재 및 재배포 금지