중앙헤럴드  시작페이지설정  즐겨찾기추가
Herald 500 Cover Campus News News Culture Archive English broadcastiong
최종편집 : 2019.10.10 목 18:58
NewsOpinion
Refined Boycott is Needed
Yang Chae-hyun  |  ych9962@cau.ac.kr
폰트키우기 폰트줄이기 프린트하기 메일보내기 신고하기
승인 2019.09.15  23:47:22
트위터 페이스북 미투데이 요즘 네이버 구글 msn

On July 4th, the Japanese government excluded Korea from its export licensing list for materials that are essential to manufacturing. It’s clear that the 4.7 retaliation is a matter of belittling Korea. Trying to shake up a country’s economy in the meager name of security isn’t hard to see as another invasion. Because the export regulation seems to appear from historical problems, Koreans are boycotting Japanese products. However, there are some extreme boycotts that fading its meaning. Long-term, refined approaches are needed, not ones that tarnish the true sense of the boycott.
Actually, this is not the first boycott against Japan. When issues about Japanese history textbook distortion issues and Takeshima Day problems arose, the claim ‘Don’t buy Japanese products’ became a popular rallying cry across Korea. But boycotts over the past 25 years have had no success. Some criticize that it is because of Koreans’ unique shortness of temper. However, the fundamental reason why boycotts continue to fail in Korea is that people forget their true purpose of doing it. Since people don’t know exactly why they boycott and don’t know what they want to achieve through it, they distort it, and the boycott dies as easily as it burns.
Media says the present boycott has continued much longer than the previous one. However, some of these reports are extremely biased and distort intentions. Actually, many reports treating about violent acts of boycotts were mostly fake. Nonetheless, they show how much animosity toward Japan is spreading among the people. All of these current situations can be attributed to shallow reasons such as ‘tell Japan how powerful Korea is’ or ‘teach Japan a lesson.’ The real reason why the present boycott has lasted longer than before is because the issue of export regulation itself is large, so if it were to boycott for such same false reasons, it would be as easy to forget as before.
As a mature citizen, anyone who is torn about how to boycott, and want to show the criticism, think about what action is the most ‘refined’ way. The boycott is a means to call for lifting export restrictions, not to generate a hostile relationship. Only then can the boycott accurately convey to Japan what Korea claims. The boycott should proceed with fundamental pressure, not with sudden or extreme acts of nationalism. Extreme boycotts are likely only to create unconditional antipathy toward Japan and quickly cool down. Korea should make its point clear and not be so radical and rustic as to forget its basic purpose. It should not be forgotten that only the most sophisticated methods provide a driving force to survive and sustain it.
The Japanese boycott is not an anti-Japanese movement. The radical anti-Japanese movement distorts the boycott, labeling it justified and will most likely lead to insults and hatred of individuals. With the purpose and value of the boycott undermined, the unconditional hatred for Japan should not be the basis of the boycott. To respond to Japan’s inappropriate actions in a long-term and correct manner, it must be carried out in a healthy and refined manner with a mature sense of citizenship.
 

< 저작권자 © 중앙헤럴드 무단전재 및 재배포금지 >
폰트키우기 폰트줄이기 프린트하기 메일보내기 신고하기
트위터 페이스북 미투데이 요즘 네이버 구글 msn 뒤로가기 위로가기
이 기사에 대한 댓글 이야기 (0)
자동등록방지용 코드를 입력하세요!   
확인
- 200자까지 쓰실 수 있습니다. (현재 0 byte / 최대 400byte)
- 욕설등 인신공격성 글은 삭제 합니다. [운영원칙]
이 기사에 대한 댓글 이야기 (0)
 
신문사소개기사제보광고문의불편신고청소년보호정책개인정보취급방침이메일무단수집거부
06974) 서울특별시 동작구 흑석로 84 중앙대학교 310관(100주년기념관) B201호 중앙헤럴드 | 전화 02-881-7363
명칭 : 중앙헤럴드 | 인터넷총괄책임자 : 편집국장 | 게시판총괄책임자 : 편집국장 | 청소년보호책임자 : 편집국장
중앙헤럴드의 모든 콘텐츠는 저작권법의 보호를 받은바, 무단 전재와 복사, 배포 등을 금합니다.
Copyright 2019 중앙헤럴드. All rights reserved. mail to webmaster@cauon.net