중앙헤럴드  시작페이지설정  즐겨찾기추가
최종편집 : 2017.11.15 수 22:47
NewsInternational Desk
Balancing Tradition and Progress
Hwang Hae-soo  |  haisoo08@cau.ac.kr
폰트키우기 폰트줄이기 프린트하기 메일보내기 신고하기
승인 2017.08.06  19:37:10
트위터 페이스북 미투데이 요즘 네이버 구글 msn
If tradition is a collective term that refers to the values of the past, then modern people would not feel obligated to keep it intact since it would be considered as a useless relic of what once was useful to society, but has currently lost its value. A sure example of such behavior would be how contemporary Korean society trades cultural uniqueness for the pursuit of efficiency and convenience. While it’s easy to think that such tradeoffs are inevitable in the fast changing, competitive nature of global communities, there are cases of developed countries that have successfully preserved culture and used it to their advantage in their growing progress. Why Bother with the Old? While there are cliché arguments such as how the identity crisis of today’s citizens is related to the blurring of cultural traits, such hold no power in a world where the frontrunners of humankind’s ideals are individualism and pragmatism. Yet, the real reason behind the importance of traditional values lies in the very essence of the two combined. It would be an understatement to say that the world revolves around the typical capitalist system, and therefore tradition, as far-fetched as it sounds, is a necessary tool to ensure further benefits like profits and fame. While cases of the commercialization of tradition will be showcased later, the basic idea remains the same regardless of countries; tradition is a currency that can be exchanged into financial, corporal, or even workplace values. Korea Now But before considering successful attempts of merging traditional and modern values, one must study the current environment of the nation beforehand, to correctly compare and improve from the situation at hand. The Korean traditional market has long lost favor of younger generations, and even promised attempts at reforming local stores to accommodate tradition have failed to acquire wanted results. The tourism industry is better off, but still shows a consistent decline in number of tourists each year, with even Korean’s preferring to visit other countries for vacation instead of visiting national places. Examples of Other Countries Italy Italy’s tourism industry is undoubtedly far more successful in terms of fame and profit compared to Korea’s. Venice is known to have more tourists than actual residents, with 20,000 new tourists visiting every day during the vacation season. Such success probably has to do with national pride. Since it’s hard to compare such subjective character between countries, one can instead examine the difference by looking at social phenomena. An example would be how Italy’s pride for its quality in Italian made items stretch far enough to account for the taste of its cuisine. Compared to Korea, where it’s hard to tell the difference of a place that serves quality food and not merely a copied version of it, Italian residents consider not only taste as the criteria of good food, but also the ingredients and ambience related to diners in everyday conversations. This is not to say that Koreans don’t care about good ingredients, but rather that the social trend is less skewed when it comes to grading restaurants according to taste. The result is the difference in connotation of “made in Korea” and “fatto in Italia.” The U.S The United States is well known for its stereotypical image of ignorant and overly confident cowboys, but behind such flamboyancy is a national history shorter than most of its global neighbors. Such characteristics are most evident in the first episode of the Newsroom, where a blond sorority student is seen asking renown political thinkers the question “What makes America the greatest country in the world?” The answer is devastating to say the least, as the interviewee slaughters the audience with facts and criticism towards the ignorant generation for all to see. But regardless, such confidence in national character is surely of some value, such as a sense of unity based on culture and tradition. Of course, this doesn’t mean that Korea should follow the footsteps of the above-mentioned countries. Rather, the country should learn how to successfully use shared tradition as an item to enhance commerce and unity. Doing so would not only re-define Korea as an economically developed nation, but also result in a socially sound cultural landscape.< 저작권자 © 중앙헤럴드 무단전재 및 재배포금지 >
폰트키우기 폰트줄이기 프린트하기 메일보내기 신고하기
트위터 페이스북 미투데이 요즘 네이버 구글 msn 뒤로가기 위로가기
이 기사에 대한 댓글 이야기 (0)
자동등록방지용 코드를 입력하세요!   
확인
- 200자까지 쓰실 수 있습니다. (현재 0 byte / 최대 400byte)
- 욕설등 인신공격성 글은 삭제 합니다. [운영원칙]
이 기사에 대한 댓글 이야기 (0)
 
신문사소개기사제보광고문의불편신고청소년보호정책개인정보취급방침이메일무단수집거부
우)156-756 서울 동작구 흑석동 221 학생문화관 2층 언론매체부(중대신문 편집국) | 전화 02-820-6245
팩스 02-817-9347 | 인터넷총괄책임 : 방송국장 | 게시판총괄책임 : 편집국장| 청소년보호책임자 : 김다혜
Copyright 2011 중앙헤럴드. All rights reserved. mail to webmaster@cauon.net