중앙헤럴드  시작페이지설정  즐겨찾기추가
최종편집 : 2017.11.15 수 22:47
CoverControversial Issues
Looking Over an Amendment Regarding the Broadcasting of Trials
이현조 기자  |  alice3089@cau.ac.kr
폰트키우기 폰트줄이기 프린트하기 메일보내기 신고하기
승인 2017.11.04  21:57:13
트위터 페이스북 미투데이 요즘 네이버 구글 msn
Lawyer Jung Ji Eun
As South Korea is a constitutional country, all the institutions and authorities should be exercised in accordance with the law. Recently, new legislation was made. On July 25th, the Supreme Court decided on an amendment to the "Regulations on Court Audiences and Broadcasting" to allow the broadcasting of trials. This is not surprising, considering that in many countries, broadcasting trials is already quite common. In the United States for example, most of the states allow broadcasting in principle. Also in England, Australia, Canada, and China, trials in the lower court can be broadcast.
Previously the regulation banned the shooting of the first and second trials. In the case of the final trial, it was left as an exception, limiting broadcasting only to the part where the pleading comes. Therefore, in the first trial of former President Park and Choi Soon-sil, the press were only allowed to take pictures and videos in the courtroom before the trial began and instructed to leave before the court proceedings. However, as more and more people argued that such high profile trials should be broadcast, it can be said that the Supreme Court reflected the public’s demand into expanding the people’s right to know.

The Supreme Court revised the court proceedings to be broadcast by the court's ruling. It is up to the judge who is overseeing the case to decide whether or not to allow the broadcast. The most important standard of allowance is the sake of public interest. Thus, if the court recognizes the necessity to broadcast the trial for public interest and the right to know, it is permitted whether or not the parties involved in criminal cases or civil cases consent to the matter. Thus, as the court no longer requires the defendants’ consent over deciding the broadcast of the trial, the new regulation is deemed to carry more weight on the side of the public. However, because the revision holds the possibility that it can lead to populism and infringement on the independence of the judiciary, the court should take a cautious and fair measure on the decision. 

< 저작권자 © 중앙헤럴드 무단전재 및 재배포금지 >
이현조 기자의 다른기사 보기  
폰트키우기 폰트줄이기 프린트하기 메일보내기 신고하기
트위터 페이스북 미투데이 요즘 네이버 구글 msn 뒤로가기 위로가기
이 기사에 대한 댓글 이야기 (0)
자동등록방지용 코드를 입력하세요!   
확인
- 200자까지 쓰실 수 있습니다. (현재 0 byte / 최대 400byte)
- 욕설등 인신공격성 글은 삭제 합니다. [운영원칙]
이 기사에 대한 댓글 이야기 (0)
 
신문사소개기사제보광고문의불편신고청소년보호정책개인정보취급방침이메일무단수집거부
우)156-756 서울 동작구 흑석동 221 학생문화관 2층 언론매체부(중대신문 편집국) | 전화 02-820-6245
팩스 02-817-9347 | 인터넷총괄책임 : 방송국장 | 게시판총괄책임 : 편집국장| 청소년보호책임자 : 김다혜
Copyright 2011 중앙헤럴드. All rights reserved. mail to webmaster@cauon.net