중앙헤럴드  시작페이지설정  즐겨찾기추가
최종편집 : 2019.9.16 월 16:04
NewsOpinion
Laws on the Income of Law Maker YouTubers Should Be Enacted
Song Na-hyun  |  kikina2@cau.ac.kr
폰트키우기 폰트줄이기 프린트하기 메일보내기 신고하기
승인 2019.05.11  00:21:02
트위터 페이스북 미투데이 요즘 네이버 구글 msn

 

There is something very hot on YouTube recently, Vlogs. A Vlog is a compound word combining video and blog, and refers to leaving a record of everyday life in a video. Many people have joined in the wave of Vlogging because they can share their daily lives with others through it, while earning advertising revenue from the number of views (for channels which achieve more than 4,000 watching hours and 1,000 subscribers). Especially, in Korea, many Vlogs of law makers become popular due to the specialty of their jobs. This trend, however, could lead to legal problems. For this reason, it is urgent to enact a law on the law makers' YouTube profits.
 
          Many legal problems arise from Korean lawmakers’ profits earned through YouTube. As mentioned above, a YouTuber who has met a certain standard can generate revenue based on the number of views. However, civil servants are not allowed to engage in any work other than public service under Article 64 of the National Civil Service law. Only a limited number of concurrent positions are allowed with permission of their chiefs. However, it is also not allowed if their duties could be disrupted. In the case of lawmakers, it becomes stricter. Under Article 29 of the National Assembly Act, a lawmaker is not allowed to hold any position for private profit, excepting the head of the National Assembly. The lawmakers could argue that the profits via YouTube are legal as their videos are related to their civil services. However, YouTube is a private corporation, and not all videos from their channels are related to their services. However, it is legally subject to sanctions, as the revenue earned on YouTube corresponds to private revenue.
Despite the situation, however, no measures have been drawn up by the National Election Commission (NEC), which monitors lawmakers for violating the National Assembly Act. Recently, many YouTube channels, like Hong-ka-cola of Hong Joon-pyo, a former leader of the opposition party, and Park Yong-jin TV of the ruling party, who want to influence the public via YouTube, have already retained tens of thousands of subscribers. However, the NEC does not give any authoritative interpretation on the lawmaker YouTubers, except giving sanctions on Hong-ka-cola TV, which gathered donations during live streaming. The attitude of NEC has made a lot of disputes among the lawmakers.
 
As the influence of YouTube is growing bigger across generations, YouTube continues to be one of the most effective media for lawmakers. However, the more this trend continues, the more the problem becomes controversial. Consequently, many lawmakers have stopped taking profits from YouTube on their own channels and asked the National Election Commission for related regulations. Amid such fast-changing trends, the National Election Commission needs to respond to it as soon as possible.
 
< 저작권자 © 중앙헤럴드 무단전재 및 재배포금지 >
폰트키우기 폰트줄이기 프린트하기 메일보내기 신고하기
트위터 페이스북 미투데이 요즘 네이버 구글 msn 뒤로가기 위로가기
이 기사에 대한 댓글 이야기 (0)
자동등록방지용 코드를 입력하세요!   
확인
- 200자까지 쓰실 수 있습니다. (현재 0 byte / 최대 400byte)
- 욕설등 인신공격성 글은 삭제 합니다. [운영원칙]
이 기사에 대한 댓글 이야기 (0)
 
신문사소개기사제보광고문의불편신고청소년보호정책개인정보취급방침이메일무단수집거부
우)156-756 서울 동작구 흑석동 221 학생문화관 2층 언론매체부(중대신문 편집국) | 전화 02-820-6245
팩스 02-817-9347 | 인터넷총괄책임 : 방송국장 | 게시판총괄책임 : 편집국장| 청소년보호책임자 : 김다혜
Copyright 2011 중앙헤럴드. All rights reserved. mail to webmaster@cauon.net