중앙헤럴드  시작페이지설정  즐겨찾기추가
Herald 500 Cover Campus News News Culture Archive English broadcastiong
최종편집 : 2019.11.29 금 15:13
CoverControversial Issues
The Consumption of Genetic Modified Food Is a Prematurity
Lee Hong-kyoon  |  hongky98@cau.ac.kr
폰트키우기 폰트줄이기 프린트하기 메일보내기 신고하기
승인 2019.09.10  18:10:46
트위터 페이스북 미투데이 요즘 네이버 구글 msn

 

The first commercialization of GMO food was made in 1994, a non-soft tomato developed by the U.S. company Calgene. However, despite 25 years passing since GMO food was commercialized, controversy over GMO food development continues. When GMOs were first introduced to the public, people thought that in the near future there would be perfect foods like Ambrosia and Nexar, the food eaten by the gods of Olympus. It has been expected to be a fundamental solution to the global hunger problem with the increase in innovative production. Contrary to expectations, however, GMOs are showing a growing number of side effects. The reason is that GMOs are fundamentally Man-made manipulated organism. Now, lets look at the various side effects of GMO food.

First, GMO food creates confusion in the ecosystem. Naturally all foods reproduce seeds through fruit. And before bearing fruit, crossbreeding is done through pollen. The problem is that GMO food genes are passed on to the non-GMO food, essentially a type of crossbreeding. If crossbreeding occurs, there are chances that genetic modification will occur in non-GMO foods. These uncontrolled transformations inevitably have an adverse impact on the ecosystem. Nature undergoes a process of evolution over the course of centuries, or at least a few decades. This evolution is stable in a direction optimized for the surrounding ecosystem. However, in the case of GMO foods, it is able to cause confusion because it was created without consideration of the ecosystem. Also, GMO foods destroy the food chain in the ecosystem. According to the research by the European Environment Agency, GMO foods inevitably cause fatal damage to organic crops, creating super weeds and exterminate wild animals. It is common for GMO foods to be designed to have strong resistance to pesticides and herbicides. With this strong tolerance, producers will use stronger pesticides and herbicides. At first, the weeds and pasts will not be able to withstand pesticides and herbicides that are strong in insect damage and weeds. However, over time, pests and weeds will develop strong resistance through evolution. As a result, producers will strengthen the pesticides and herbicides. During this process, non-GMO varieties that cannot withstand strong pesticides and herbicides will go extinct, resulting in a uniform number of species.

Second, GMO foods have not been fully tested for potential dangers. Although commercialization of GMO foods has taken place and there has been no clear evidence that GMO foods are harmful to humans over the past 25 years, neither has there been a clear safety test. The reaction within the human body with ingested GMO food and the potential problems with other proteins are still unknown. GMO foods destroy the stability created to match the surrounding ecosystem during the process of artificially manufacturing to insert or delete new genes. In addition, if unstable genes accumulate in the long term in the human body, they can cause allergies or risk birth of deformed babies. Thus, the short history of 25 years is not enough to guarantee safety. As an example of showing instability in GMO technology there is a GMO dietary supplement including L-tryptophan [1]produced by Japanese firm Showa Denko. Some people in North America who took this GMO dietary supplement suffered from EMS, killing 35 people with chills and muscle pain, and exposing some 1,500 people to potential dangers. As a surprise, the factor that caused the disease within this dietary supplement was very small, at 0.01 percent of the total mass. As such, the safety verification of GMO foods must be done sufficiently as it could come as a great danger to humans no matter how few. Thus, current GMO foods that are not sufficiently tested for safety are likely to threaten the lives of humans.

Third, GMO foods undermine that fairness of the food market by giving certain companies exclusive rights. To develop GMO, a company must invest a lot of capital, time and technology, and is granted patent rights, a legal right if it succeeds in development. As a result, a high entry barrier in GMO food causes a particular company to form a kind of monopoly. In addition, GMO food has a much higher viability than non-GMO food and better unit costs and production per unit, resulting in many producers choosing to grow GMO seeds. This not only reduces seed diversity but also increases reliance on multinational companies. One may wonder what the problem is with this phenomenon is. However, it is worth noting that Monsanto Company, which accounts for 90 percent of the global share of genetically modified crops, invests the most in no reproducing of seeds among their R&D counterparts. In other words, this is a strategy to get producers to buy new seeds from businesses to grow new crops, resulting in the eventual unification of seeds and further consolidating monopoly on certain multinational companies. The main purpose of a company is to generate profits and are less focused on the good of the people. Nevertheless, companies maintain scarcity of food by adjusting supply to maximize profits based on their position in the food market. The following series of processes will force the seeds to be unified and producers to become dependent on multinational companies that produce those seeds. And based on these monopolies, multinational companies will manipulate output and prices to maximize profit, thereby undermining the fairness of the food market.

Recently, consumers have been paying a lot of interest to safe eating as many people seek well-being foods. However, GMO food has yet to be verified for its safety. Black-and-white proof of the safety of GMO foods is needed since there isnt clear evidence yet that it is harmful. Furthermore, GMO food creates confusion in the ecosystem and hurts the fairness of the food market. Of course, there is no denying that GMO foods have many advantages. However, before accepting GMO foods, objective and sophisticated research results should be presented to address the current potential risks.

[1]A type of essential amino acid derived for the LMO microorganism

 

< 저작권자 © 중앙헤럴드 무단전재 및 재배포금지 >
폰트키우기 폰트줄이기 프린트하기 메일보내기 신고하기
트위터 페이스북 미투데이 요즘 네이버 구글 msn 뒤로가기 위로가기
이 기사에 대한 댓글 이야기 (0)
자동등록방지용 코드를 입력하세요!   
확인
- 200자까지 쓰실 수 있습니다. (현재 0 byte / 최대 400byte)
- 욕설등 인신공격성 글은 삭제 합니다. [운영원칙]
이 기사에 대한 댓글 이야기 (0)
 
신문사소개기사제보광고문의불편신고청소년보호정책개인정보취급방침이메일무단수집거부
06974) 서울특별시 동작구 흑석로 84 중앙대학교 310관(100주년기념관) B201호 중앙헤럴드 | 전화 02-881-7363
명칭 : 중앙헤럴드 | 인터넷총괄책임자 : 편집국장 | 게시판총괄책임자 : 편집국장 | 청소년보호책임자 : 편집국장
중앙헤럴드의 모든 콘텐츠는 저작권법의 보호를 받은바, 무단 전재와 복사, 배포 등을 금합니다.
Copyright 2019 중앙헤럴드. All rights reserved. mail to webmaster@cauon.net